Fill Out a Valid Da 2166 9 1 Form

When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, attention to detail is crucial. Here are ten important dos and don’ts to ensure accuracy and compliance.

• Do double-check all personal information, including name and SSN.
• Do use the correct email address format (.gov or .mil) for all entries.
• Do ensure the dates are in the proper format (YYYYMMDD).
• Do confirm that the period covered is accurately reflected.
• Do provide clear and concise descriptions in the duty section.

• Don't leave any fields blank unless specifically instructed.
• Don't use abbreviations that may not be understood by all reviewers.
• Don't forget to sign and date the form where required.
• Don't submit the form without reviewing it for errors.
• Don't overlook the importance of counseling dates; they must be accurate.

Completing this form correctly is essential for proper evaluation. Take your time and ensure every section is filled out completely and accurately.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an essential document used for the evaluation of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. Here are some key takeaways regarding its completion and usage:

• Accurate Information: Ensure that all administrative data in Part I is filled out correctly, including name, SSN, rank, and unit information.
• Submission Reasons: Clearly indicate the reason for submission, as it can affect the evaluation process.
• Rater and Senior Rater: The signatures of both the rater and senior rater are crucial. Their assessments carry significant weight in the evaluation.
• Duty Description: In Part III, provide a detailed account of the NCO's daily duties, areas of special emphasis, and any appointed duties.
• Performance Evaluation: Part IV requires a thorough evaluation of the NCO’s performance in various areas such as character, presence, and intellect.
• APFT Details: Include the results of the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) and ensure comments are provided for any failures or profiles.
• Signature Acknowledgment: The rated NCO’s signature does not imply agreement with the evaluation but confirms the accuracy of the administrative data.
• Counseling Dates: Document all counseling dates accurately, as this shows the progression of the NCO’s development.
• Senior Rater Assessment: The senior rater must provide a comparative assessment of the NCO’s potential against peers.
• Broadening Assignments: When filling out the senior rater section, include two successive assignments and one broadening assignment to illustrate the NCO’s career trajectory.

Understanding these key points can help ensure that the DA Form 2166-9-1 is completed effectively, reflecting the NCO’s performance and potential accurately.

Here are four common misconceptions about the DA 2166-9-1 form, along with clarifications for each.

• Misconception 1: The form is only for annual evaluations.

This is incorrect. The DA 2166-9-1 form can be used for various evaluation periods, not just annual ones. It is important to submit this form whenever there is a need for a performance assessment, regardless of the time frame.

• Misconception 2: Only the rater can provide input on the evaluation.

While the rater plays a significant role, the rated NCO also contributes by providing their signature and verifying the accuracy of the administrative data. This ensures that all parties involved have a clear understanding of the evaluation process.

• Misconception 3: The rated NCO's signature indicates agreement with the evaluation.

This is misleading. The signature of the rated NCO does not imply agreement or disagreement with the assessment. It simply confirms that they have reviewed the report and that the administrative data is correct.

• Misconception 4: The form is only relevant for specific ranks.

This is false. The DA 2166-9-1 form applies to all NCOs, regardless of their rank. It serves as a standardized method for evaluating performance and potential across various levels within the Army.

• DA Form 2166-9-2: This form is similar to the DA 2166-9-1 as it serves as a Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report but is intended for the SFC (Sergeant First Class) rank. Both documents require similar administrative data, performance evaluations, and signatures from raters and senior raters, ensuring a consistent evaluation process across different ranks.

• DA Form 67-9: The DA 67-9 is used for officer evaluations and shares many structural similarities with the DA 2166-9-1. Both forms require information about the individual’s duties, performance assessments, and feedback from superiors. This ensures that evaluations are standardized across both enlisted and officer ranks.

• DA Form 4856: This form is a Developmental Counseling Form that also includes sections for documenting performance and future goals. Like the DA 2166-9-1, it requires signatures from both the counselor and the individual being counseled, emphasizing accountability and acknowledgment of performance discussions.

• DA Form 2166-8: This is the Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report for the rank of E-5 and below. It mirrors the DA 2166-9-1 in terms of structure and purpose, focusing on evaluating performance and potential, ensuring that all NCOs receive thorough and consistent assessments regardless of their rank.